<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AaronHardy.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronhardy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronhardy.com</link>
	<description>For all your Aaron Hardy needs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on JavaScript Architecture: Backbone.js Views by Aaron Hardy</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/javascript/javascript-architecture-backbone-js-views/comment-page-1/#comment-37624</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=1250#comment-37624</guid>
		<description>@Trouble,

Thanks for stopping by. I hope your real name is Trouble &#039;cause that&#039;d be aaawesooome. For those who don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about, I think you&#039;re referring to this:

https://github.com/documentcloud/backbone/pull/710

I&#039;ve chimed in to give my support for supporting AMD in their libraries.  I think the other folks on the list have done a good job at representing the pros and cons. It&#039;s a bummer they&#039;ve decided to remove AMD support but I&#039;d rather have both backbone and underscore not support it than only underscore (which is how it currently is).

Overall, I think AMD is a great standard and needs to happen.

@nros83 Thanks. It is quite juicy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Trouble,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by. I hope your real name is Trouble &#8217;cause that&#8217;d be aaawesooome. For those who don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about, I think you&#8217;re referring to this:</p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/documentcloud/backbone/pull/710" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/documentcloud/backbone/pull/710</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve chimed in to give my support for supporting AMD in their libraries.  I think the other folks on the list have done a good job at representing the pros and cons. It&#8217;s a bummer they&#8217;ve decided to remove AMD support but I&#8217;d rather have both backbone and underscore not support it than only underscore (which is how it currently is).</p>
<p>Overall, I think AMD is a great standard and needs to happen.</p>
<p>@nros83 Thanks. It is quite juicy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JavaScript Architecture: Organization and Quality by Aaron Hardy</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/javascript/javascript-architecture-organization-and-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-37623</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=1040#comment-37623</guid>
		<description>Very observant and those are great questions. I think it comes down to your project, organization, and style.  I do feel like completely abstracting the core libraries, though maybe ideal, is overboard in most cases and can be difficult and resource-intensive to do right.  If you really like the features of Backbone then writing an abstraction layer would likely end up being basically a pass-through layer.  The theory is right, but if you decide to change libraries, you&#039;ll likely be changing not only because of speed, robustness, etc, but because of improved APIs.  At that point, better APIs won&#039;t make much of an impact without also changing your abstraction layer...which can defeat its purpose.

The line doesn&#039;t have to be completely on one side or the other though.  For example, I&#039;d consider making a toggle button backbone-agnostic because it&#039;s very possible someone in the organization might want to use it without backbone (even if it&#039;s us in the future) and backbone isn&#039;t crucial in something so granular.  On the other hand, the more container-like (less granular) views are quite specific to my project and backbone really comes in handy so I feel more comfortable using backbone.  Where that line starts or where you start abstracting is up to you and your team.  How&#039;s that for vague?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very observant and those are great questions. I think it comes down to your project, organization, and style.  I do feel like completely abstracting the core libraries, though maybe ideal, is overboard in most cases and can be difficult and resource-intensive to do right.  If you really like the features of Backbone then writing an abstraction layer would likely end up being basically a pass-through layer.  The theory is right, but if you decide to change libraries, you&#8217;ll likely be changing not only because of speed, robustness, etc, but because of improved APIs.  At that point, better APIs won&#8217;t make much of an impact without also changing your abstraction layer&#8230;which can defeat its purpose.</p>
<p>The line doesn&#8217;t have to be completely on one side or the other though.  For example, I&#8217;d consider making a toggle button backbone-agnostic because it&#8217;s very possible someone in the organization might want to use it without backbone (even if it&#8217;s us in the future) and backbone isn&#8217;t crucial in something so granular.  On the other hand, the more container-like (less granular) views are quite specific to my project and backbone really comes in handy so I feel more comfortable using backbone.  Where that line starts or where you start abstracting is up to you and your team.  How&#8217;s that for vague?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JavaScript Architecture: Backbone.js Views by nross83</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/javascript/javascript-architecture-backbone-js-views/comment-page-1/#comment-37614</link>
		<dc:creator>nross83</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=1250#comment-37614</guid>
		<description>This is a very tasty series and your good examples make it really easy to follow.  I&#039;m pretty impressed with Backbone and how they have tried to come up with nice conventions to shorten your code (like in your Event Delegation section).  Just pure juiciness.

Can&#039;t wait for the next addition to your series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very tasty series and your good examples make it really easy to follow.  I&#8217;m pretty impressed with Backbone and how they have tried to come up with nice conventions to shorten your code (like in your Event Delegation section).  Just pure juiciness.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait for the next addition to your series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JavaScript Architecture: Backbone.js Views by Trouble</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/javascript/javascript-architecture-backbone-js-views/comment-page-1/#comment-37545</link>
		<dc:creator>Trouble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=1250#comment-37545</guid>
		<description>Precious like the Other Posts! i really appreciate your Tutorials!
What are you thinking about the &quot;war&quot; between backbone.js/underscore.js and require.js/AMD??

Are u planning to write something about AMD + Documentcloud?

From Germany</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Precious like the Other Posts! i really appreciate your Tutorials!<br />
What are you thinking about the &#8220;war&#8221; between backbone.js/underscore.js and require.js/AMD??</p>
<p>Are u planning to write something about AMD + Documentcloud?</p>
<p>From Germany</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JavaScript Architecture: Organization and Quality by Ksenia</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/javascript/javascript-architecture-organization-and-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-37414</link>
		<dc:creator>Ksenia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=1040#comment-37414</guid>
		<description>Hi Aaron, very interesting post series, especially as I&#039;m discovering JS apps architecture.
Have a couple of questions, though. In his presentation on scalable JS arch Nicholas Zakas advises us to abstract out the frameworks (JQuery is in his list too). I wanted to ask your opinion on how much libraries/frameworks are allowed to be used in modules? For me it seems a little bit paranoic to build own abstraction around another abstraction built around DOM operations. I understand the implications that some day I will fall in love with some other lib, but is it worth the effort? 
Another side of this same question is using backbone, does this also contradict to Zakas&#039; architecture and we should abstract out backbone?

Thanks again for your effort on working on this series!

Regards,
Ksenia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron, very interesting post series, especially as I&#8217;m discovering JS apps architecture.<br />
Have a couple of questions, though. In his presentation on scalable JS arch Nicholas Zakas advises us to abstract out the frameworks (JQuery is in his list too). I wanted to ask your opinion on how much libraries/frameworks are allowed to be used in modules? For me it seems a little bit paranoic to build own abstraction around another abstraction built around DOM operations. I understand the implications that some day I will fall in love with some other lib, but is it worth the effort?<br />
Another side of this same question is using backbone, does this also contradict to Zakas&#8217; architecture and we should abstract out backbone?</p>
<p>Thanks again for your effort on working on this series!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Ksenia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Loading a Remote Module into a Local App by Aaron Hardy</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/flex/loading-a-remote-module-into-a-local-app/comment-page-1/#comment-37359</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=295#comment-37359</guid>
		<description>Hey Maurice.  I remember working with runtime fonts a couple years back and I ran into a bunch of problems.  Not so much loading the font, but getting the font swf right and registering it correctly.  You can see a chronology of my battle here:

http://forums.adobe.com/thread/465439

I know I used several articles to help me figure it out.  One of them is no longer available.  I think this is a good one: http://bit.ly/4FyegT

I hope you find what you need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Maurice.  I remember working with runtime fonts a couple years back and I ran into a bunch of problems.  Not so much loading the font, but getting the font swf right and registering it correctly.  You can see a chronology of my battle here:</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.adobe.com/thread/465439" rel="nofollow">http://forums.adobe.com/thread/465439</a></p>
<p>I know I used several articles to help me figure it out.  One of them is no longer available.  I think this is a good one: <a href="http://bit.ly/4FyegT" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4FyegT</a></p>
<p>I hope you find what you need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Loading a Remote Module into a Local App by Maurice</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/flex/loading-a-remote-module-into-a-local-app/comment-page-1/#comment-37336</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=295#comment-37336</guid>
		<description>I am trying to use StyleModuleMarshallers to load an external swf with a font embedded (css converted into swf) in Flex 4.5.

In the modReadyHandler i can see it gets the font (event.currentTarget.factory._info.fonts).

Could you tell me how i can then do a Font.registerFont(font)? 

Any help would be appreciated. Also the strange thing, in debug locally it works but when i put the app online it generates an error: Error #2044: IOErrorEvent:. text=Error #2124: Loaded file is unknown type. 

Thanx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to use StyleModuleMarshallers to load an external swf with a font embedded (css converted into swf) in Flex 4.5.</p>
<p>In the modReadyHandler i can see it gets the font (event.currentTarget.factory._info.fonts).</p>
<p>Could you tell me how i can then do a Font.registerFont(font)? </p>
<p>Any help would be appreciated. Also the strange thing, in debug locally it works but when i put the app online it generates an error: Error #2044: IOErrorEvent:. text=Error #2124: Loaded file is unknown type. </p>
<p>Thanx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Loading a Remote Module into a Local App by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/flex/loading-a-remote-module-into-a-local-app/comment-page-1/#comment-37020</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=295#comment-37020</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t able to get StyleModuleMarshaller to actually apply the loaded styles to the app. I found I needed to add a call to loadStyleDeclarations in the modReadyHandler override in order to actually get them applied.

// Even though the url is passed in, it&#039;s not going to re-fetch/load the module,
// so there&#039;s no unnecessary performance penalty. 
mx.core.Singleton.getInstance(&quot;mx.styles::IStyleManager2&quot;).loadStyleDeclarations2(url, updateStylesImmediately, null, null);

As I note in the comment, I debugged and verified that the module isn&#039;t actually being refetched, since the ModuleManager singleton maintains a map of all requested URLs and their loaded modules.

Just floating this out there in case anyone else is trying to use StyleModuleMarshaller without success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t able to get StyleModuleMarshaller to actually apply the loaded styles to the app. I found I needed to add a call to loadStyleDeclarations in the modReadyHandler override in order to actually get them applied.</p>
<p>// Even though the url is passed in, it&#8217;s not going to re-fetch/load the module,<br />
// so there&#8217;s no unnecessary performance penalty.<br />
mx.core.Singleton.getInstance(&#8220;mx.styles::IStyleManager2&#8243;).loadStyleDeclarations2(url, updateStylesImmediately, null, null);</p>
<p>As I note in the comment, I debugged and verified that the module isn&#8217;t actually being refetched, since the ModuleManager singleton maintains a map of all requested URLs and their loaded modules.</p>
<p>Just floating this out there in case anyone else is trying to use StyleModuleMarshaller without success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JavaScript Architecture: Backbone.js Collections by Trouble</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/javascript/javascript-architecture-backbone-js-collections/comment-page-1/#comment-37011</link>
		<dc:creator>Trouble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=1215#comment-37011</guid>
		<description>Wow!! Great Series! i read all of them! waiting to see soon some Articles about Views and Router!

Thanks a lot Mr. Hardy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!! Great Series! i read all of them! waiting to see soon some Articles about Views and Router!</p>
<p>Thanks a lot Mr. Hardy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JavaScript Architecture: Backbone.js Events by khurram</title>
		<link>http://aaronhardy.com/javascript/javascript-architecture-backbone-js-events/comment-page-1/#comment-36943</link>
		<dc:creator>khurram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronhardy.com/?p=1161#comment-36943</guid>
		<description>Very nice thanks for sharing. I have recently implemented a small backbone application on my website all i am doing there is actually learning backbone.js i have successfully made a single page app and i am gonna extend it now please have a look at &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.yaqeenitrades.com&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yaqeeni Trades&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice thanks for sharing. I have recently implemented a small backbone application on my website all i am doing there is actually learning backbone.js i have successfully made a single page app and i am gonna extend it now please have a look at <a href='http://www.yaqeenitrades.com' rel="nofollow">Yaqeeni Trades</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

